Mobile Version  |  Register  |  Login
home  |  speak out!  |  content zone archives  |  "speak out!" archives  |  vote on it  |  soap opera  |  pub crawl  |  links  |  contact us  |  search  
 Follow us! 
Speak Out! - Other Topics
Notices
"Speak Out!" Home  |  Topic Listing  |  Post New Topic  |  Post Reply
Yesterday's HOT topics  |  Today's HOT topics
 |  Jump to:  
Topic: Bank Debt Deal
Boston Bruin
(131 Posts)
Posted: 29-Jun-2012 17:38
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
In light of yesterday’s deal on our Bank Debt and the removal of this burden from the tax payer, I am hoping that history in time will reflect kindly on Brian Lenihan’s decision to grant the Bank Guarantee. When placed in the unenvious position of being approached by the senior management of each of your country’s banks who are telling you that the banking system is about to collapse unless you do something, while at the same time knowing some of them were still probably lying through their teeth is not a decision most politicians will ever have to face. And while derided in the immediate aftermath for doing it, mostly be the usual crew who will never have the capability of providing any alternative solution, other countries have followed his lead and injected capital into their respective ailing banking systems. I’m certainly no FF’er , but to try and keep the show on the road like he did , knowing what he did about his health and display the courage and stoicism he did I personally think was remarkable. Not to mention that he was alone in facing down the unions re: pension levy etc in attempting to row back on some of the Public Sector wage circus Benchmarking Bertie had created. Howlin should take note. And to hear Gilmore on this morning talking as if he had personally negotiated the deal himself overnight was sickening.
This message has been edited - 29-jun-2012 @ 18:23
The Minstrel
(646 Posts)
Posted: 30-Jun-2012 02:58
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Bruin - I also hope that history treats Lenihan kindly, but I don't share your optimism that the latest pronouncement separates the banks obligations from those of the government.

EU leaders didn't introduce any new short-term crisis management measures that go above and beyond the ESM treaty that was agreed earlier this year. Allowing the ESM to independently provide liquidity to banks is fine per se, but there is no money in the ESM, and a large portion of what must be contributed to it will come from the very same countries that need to be bailed out. Also, the ESM is not approved in Germany yet given constitutional court challenges. There was no mention that the ESM would be granted a banking license (despite calls by several countries), which would allow it to borrow from the ECB.

All the packages announced recently (including the allocation of structural funds) stop short of new decisive measures that definitively mark a turning point. There was no agreement on moving to mutualization of nation debts, after Angela said before the summit that it would not happen "as long as I live'.
bosco32
(606 Posts)
Posted: 30-Jun-2012 11:54
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Can I ask a dumb question?

This new deal in Europe. I see how it helps Spain - there are private banks there that need bailing out. The state don't want to take on the debt that is necessary to recapitalise them so they have successfully gotten the ESM/EFSF to do it instead. Great for Spain.

This arrangement will now retrospectively apply for us - so the promissory note will be torn up and Anglo etc will be refinanced from the ESM rather than via money our Central Bank printed and were going to recoup and tear up over the next 20 years.

Here's my question. As we own Anglo and AIB how does this really change things for us?Ultimately the state still owes all the money - for Spain it means that the banks remain prviate and are being directly funded by Europe. For us they're still just another arm of the state so regardless of how they get their funding, it's still owed by us as a country.

Unless we get them to actually take the debt this isn't worth a s**te.
Blanco
(7,909 Posts)
Posted: 30-Jun-2012 12:39
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Did anyone see the lead story in the Indo today , talk about propaganda for the Government.

They give sole credit to negotiating the deal to Enda Kenny and no mention that it was the Italian PM and his Spanish counterpart which forced the Germans to eventually buckle and concede to the deal, Enda had fcuk all to do with any deal , we are just lucky that Italy and Spain have now found themselves in a similar situation to us with regards their banks been fcuked.
Pog Mahone
(9,387 Posts)
Posted: 30-Jun-2012 12:53
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Absolutely spot on Blanco, the Spanish and Italians play hard ball, we ask 'how would you like us to take it Angela', they get a deal, we may get some benefit from the hind tit, the actual benefit isn't clear to me, all it seems to mean is that we might get longer to pay off the debt. The bank debt will be removed from the sovereign debt but we still owe the bank debt so in terms of what we have to pay back nothing appears to have changed as far as I can see.

What was unbelievably 'hide under the duvet' cringeworthy stuff though was what Kenny came out with afterwards, "To those the naysayers who say you should be beating the Lambeg drum up and down the streets of Europe, there is another way of getting results and that's what interests me, I'm a hard grafter and as some of them found out, they shouldn't tangle with me too often", how appallingly awful is that, this guy is more embarrassing than Jedward. OMG!!
Larkin
(4,404 Posts)
Posted: 30-Jun-2012 13:49
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Very good points above me there lads. What we have is more bullshhit and bluster from Kenny and Gilmore. Along with the crap Jan O'Sullivan came out with yesterday it is apparent that the people of this country voted in an even bigger shower of self serving morons than the last lot. This is what Namawinelake have to say on the matter.

EU debt deal – there is no Santa Claus, someone has to pay
June 29, 2012 by namawinelake
Having studied the statements emerging this morning after yet another marathon EU summit, I am still scratching my head to see what all the fuss is about.

The markets certainly believe something has agreed which strengthens the debt sustainability of Spain, Italy and Ireland with bond rates tumbling this morning. Though having said that, Ireland’s benchmark 9-year bond is presently at 6.77% down from 7.1% yesterday, but 6.8% is the same as just a few weeks ago before Spain asked for a bailout or “credit facility”. Spain’s 10-year bond is at 6.6% which is down from the 7% yesterday, but still at an elevated unsustainable level.

So has there been a Big Bang, a new dawn in Europe and the seeds of a solution to the four-year old crisis?

If there is, I can’t see it.

There is no development apparent in the announcements which will see Ireland’s bank-bailout generated debt shared or reduced. And in Ireland’s case, that’s the issue – the 40% of debt:GDP which the country is shouldering to bail out banks. What we get is a fund which will loan money directly to banks. The fund will not absorb losses. The fund will want its loans back. There is no Santa Claus.

The summit statement from European Council president Herman van Rumpuy goes as follows:

“We affirm that it is imperative to break the vicious circle between banks and sovereigns. The Commission will present Proposals on the basis of Article 127(6) for a single supervisory mechanism shortly. We ask the Council to consider these Proposals as a matter of urgency by the end of 2012. When an effective single supervisory mechanism is established, involving the ECB, for banks in the euro area the ESM could, following a regular decision, have the possibility to recapitalize banks directly. This would rely on appropriate conditionality, including compliance with state aid rules, which should be institution specific, sector-specific or economy-wide and would be formalised in a Memorandum of Understanding. The Eurogroup will examine the situation of the Irish financial sector with the view of further improving the sustainability of the well-performing adjustment programme. Similar cases will be treated equally.”

Ireland’s banks are already recapitalized, in fact we have the most capitalized banks in the EU. There is a distinct possibility of additional capital being required for Irish banks – Matthew Elderfield has flagged €4bn of additional requirements, and if the mortgage crisis results in the crystallization of losses at the banks, then that too will generate a need more capital, as will a deterioration in the economy. But there is absolutely no indication that some Santa Claus will shoulder losses in individual countries’ banks.

What does this mean for us? Nothing, as far as I can see. No-one is suggesting any new fund will foot the bill for bank losses – past, present or future losses/losses in Ireland, Spain or elsewhere. Think about it – who would pay for such losses? Germany? France? China? Santa Claus?

Ireland gets a specific mention in the summit statement. And there is a compliment for our “well-performing adjustment programme” – so far we have met all financial targets in the Memorandum of Understanding, but with another €5,000 per household of adjustment needed with the “low hanging fruit” well-and-truly picked, that adjustment programme will be increasingly difficult to comply with. But what is meant by the “situation of the Irish financial sector”? We have bailed out the banks to the tune of €68bn – €28bn of extant promissory notes, €5bn in NAMA bonds and the rest in cash, which given we are running deficits, is borrowed. There is no suggestion of a refund for cash already injected into the banks, and if there is some debt writedown on the promissory notes, who will pay for that?

What we have got today from the EU is some more L’Oreal skin cream which smells pleasant, moisturises the skin and leaves a nice texture. What we have, however, is skin cancer and these announcements by themselves don’t deal with the disease of actual bank losses.
Ozzy
(1,867 Posts)
Posted: 30-Jun-2012 13:53
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
History will not reflect well on Lenihan. Whatever about BoI and AIB, including Anglo and particularly Irish Nationwide in the guarantee was scandalous.
While he deserves credit for the cuts in public sector pay, it was also the obvious thing to do, and a failure to do anything would have resulted in even more criticism than cuts. Remember public pressure changed the form of the second pay reduction, which originally was to be linked to extra holidays.
People are going to keep knocking the current government, but they have performed way better than their predecessors. Although that was almost inevitable.
Blanco
(7,909 Posts)
Posted: 30-Jun-2012 14:51
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Originally posted by Ozzy:
History will not reflect well on Lenihan. Whatever about BoI and AIB, including Anglo and particularly Irish Nationwide in the guarantee was scandalous.

But there will be nothing to reflect on , everyone is still completely in the dark about the events that happened, and as time goes on the chances of exactly finding out what happened get slimer and slimer.

We still don't know who was exactly in the room when the guarantee idea was brought up and agreed on

But this time we cannot blame the TD's it was the people who voted to have no inquiry.

There was a legal expert on the radio a week or so ago who was saying that he thinks it still is legally possible to have an inquiry without resorting to a 20 yr tribunal , he reckoned we need a Public inquiry where former Government ministers(including Cowen), Senior Civil Servants , Senior bankers , senior adviser's would be compelled to come and state their role in the whole debacle. And not having one would be as scandalous as the events themselves.

And of course the response from a FF TD was that you can't go against the will of the people , they voted down the inquiry proposal in the referendum, and this time FF are right.
bosco32
(606 Posts)
Posted: 30-Jun-2012 16:10
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Originally posted by Blanco:
But this time we cannot blame the TD's it was the people who voted to have no inquiry.

The people did not vote to have no enquiry. They voted against giving unqualified people with vested political interests free rein to march rough shod over the rights of citizens. Enquiries should be done by people who don't have to run for election every five years or less.
Blanco
(7,909 Posts)
Posted: 30-Jun-2012 16:19
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Originally posted by bosco32:
The people did not vote to have no enquiry. They voted against giving unqualified people with vested political interests free rein to march rough shod over the rights of citizens. Enquiries should be done by people who don't have to run for election every five years or less.

Are you happy with what we have got then? ie nothing only the likes of Cowen , Seanie and Fingers smirking at us.

The inquires were to be held in full view of the public with those having legal recourse if they felt they were been hard done by. All the people done was back up the judgement in the Callely case, and made these parasites untouchable.

Parliamentary inquires work in lot of other countries in the world.

But here we are too concerned with Seanie's and Fingers rights to even ask them any questions.

The people were taken in by McDowel's late intervention and just don't want to admit now, and he only done it to get some attention, he said at the time it wouldn't stop us having an inquiry , where is he now?


Larkin
(4,404 Posts)
Posted: 30-Jun-2012 19:35
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
I voted no to that in the referendum and like Bosco says, it was a piece of ill thought out legislation by the crowd of traitors that are in power right now and they handled it so badly.

From what I can see from my reading of this legislation, the banks still hold all the trump cards and the ordinary punter, who did not party they merely bought a home, gets to carry the can with no penalties for the banks. As Diarmuid O'Flynn tweeted today '10 yrs hard labour on bread & water commuted to 20 yrs debtor's prison for crime we didn't commit - no, we're STILL not happy'.
Blanco
(7,909 Posts)
Posted: 30-Jun-2012 19:42
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Originally posted by Larkin:
I voted no to that in the referendum and like Bosco says, it was a piece of ill thought out legislation by the crowd of traitors that are in power right now and they handled it so badly..

Those who voted no , all it achieved was getting all those responsible off on a technicality. They couldn't believe their luck , and only in Ireland would it happen , sometimes you do get what you deserve.



wolfe_tone
(100 Posts)
Posted: 30-Jun-2012 21:07
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Same closet ffs spoofing the same sh&t....dead and buried lads.up sf.
jbrown
(421 Posts)
Posted: 30-Jun-2012 21:34
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Lenihan should not be remembered for anything other than trying to look after the FF cronies in the same sweep of a brush as look after the country.

By all means bankroll BOI and AIB but the rest of the banks (In particular Anglo / FF) should have got the door.

Let Anglo etal collapse and the people abroad who lent them cash would have just had to get over their mistakes.

It would be all forgotten now.

Instead they tried to keep the Anglo FF cartel afloat the same way as Hitler tried to defend Berlin to he last. Same mentality really, pride before a fall.
Pog Mahone
(9,387 Posts)
Posted: 30-Jun-2012 21:43
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Originally posted by jbrown:
Let Anglo etal collapse and the people abroad who lent them cash would have just had to get over their mistakes.

What would have happened to the deposits with Anglo etal?

Larkin
(4,404 Posts)
Posted: 30-Jun-2012 22:24
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Originally posted by jbrown:
Lenihan should not be remembered for anything other than trying to look after the FF cronies in the same sweep of a brush as look after the country.By all means bankroll BOI and AIB but the rest of the banks (In particular Anglo / FF) should have got the door.Let Anglo etal collapse and the people abroad who lent them cash would have just had to get over their mistakes.It would be all forgotten now.Instead they tried to keep the Anglo FF cartel afloat the same way as Hitler tried to defend Berlin to he last. Same mentality really, pride before a fall.

Why BOI and AIB? I know that Anglo was the developers bank with no ATM's so is this why? The other two sets of liars were on 'our' side?
jbrown
(421 Posts)
Posted: 01-Jul-2012 11:43
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Originally posted by Pog Mahone:
What would have happened to the deposits with Anglo etal?

I have no idea, would the government be able to compensate people, create a "good" bank instead of a bad bank.

It would be a damn sight cheaper than taking on all the loans.
jbrown
(421 Posts)
Posted: 01-Jul-2012 11:48
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Originally posted by Larkin:
Why BOI and AIB? I know that Anglo was the developers bank with no ATM's so is this why? The other two sets of liars were on 'our' side?

AIB and B of I because they are who most people use, and they have ATM's, as you said.

Yes AIB and BOI are a pack of liars but the country needs banks. Saving these 2 would save most of the population. Remember the government effecively became owners of these so we have more or less ended up with a national bank system.

At least if they could be made profitable in 5 years giving out car loans and normal mortgages they could be privatised in due course.
bosco32
(606 Posts)
Posted: 01-Jul-2012 12:22
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Originally posted by Blanco:
Are you happy with what we have got then? ie nothing only the likes of Cowen , Seanie and Fingers smirking at us.The inquires were to be held in full view of the public with those having legal recourse if they felt they were been hard done by. All the people done was back up the judgement in the Callely case, and made these parasites untouchable.Parliamentary inquires work in lot of other countries in the world.But here we are too concerned with Seanie's and Fingers rights to even ask them any questions.The people were taken in by McDowel's late intervention and just don't want to admit now, and he only done it to get some attention, he said at the time it wouldn't stop us having an inquiry , where is he now?

That's complete rubbish Blanco. One of the major issues with the legislation was that people wouldn't have legal recourse. What makes you think that these people are qualified to conduct inquiries because they're absolutely not.

And as for other countries you only have to look at the Leveson Inquiry across the water to see how it's just a platform for politicians to score points off the back of a particular situation.

The government are using this as a convenient excuse not to have an inquiry. Politicians are delighted to beat the tribunal costs drum because they simply don't want the courts looking into how they conduct their affairs. And they have the public on board because we love to complain about the cost of everything yet know the value of nothing.
Larkin
(4,404 Posts)
Posted: 01-Jul-2012 16:46
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
I know Ross was one of Fitzpatricks cheerleaders but it's hard to disagree with what he says here.

Shane Ross: Remember, none of this catastrophe is the fault of bankers
WHAT A BANKER: While Richie Boucher became a millionaire, Bank of Ireland shareholders were being ruined

By Shane Ross
Sunday July 01 2012

COME back, Brian Goggin, Eugene Sheehy, Sean FitzPatrick, David Drumm, Michael Fingleton, Dermot Gleeson and Richard Burrows. All is forgiven. What a terrible misunderstanding.

The banking collapse was not your fault. It was an awful mistake. You did not lend recklessly. You are perfectly fit to run a bank.

On Thursday the Central Bank gave the all-clear to the surviving ghosts of the banking holocaust, the bankers who came through the 2008 massacre of Ireland's banks, the slaughter of small shareholders, the penury of taxpayers and the crippled Irish economy.

Two guys who sat tight through the disaster, in which they were active participants, have been told to continue doing what they do worst -- run bankrupt banks.

Richie Boucher,chief executive of Bank of Ireland, and Kevin Murphy, retiring chief executive of Irish Life, have been cleared by the Central Bank as suitable guys to continue in the careers which they have pursued with such disastrous consequences for Ireland.

No one is saying that either Boucher or Murphy are dishonest. Far from it. But they are rich, very rich. Boucher receives a €690,000-a-year package. They have been made even richer since the banking Armageddon of 2008.

While Boucher and Murphy became millionaires, their shareholders were being ruined. Bank of Ireland's share price has fallen from over €18 to Friday's level of just nine cent. Their dividends are no more.

Boucher was a director throughout the collapse. He was chief executive while much of the slaughter of his innocent shareholders was happening.

Irish Life's share price fell from a high of €22.80 in 2007 to Friday's level of just two cent while Kevin was a director. A board member since 1999, he was made chief executive in June 2009. The Central Bank has found that the duo are appropriate people to stay in the saddle.

Are they joking ?

Sadly not. The freshly tamed Central Bank is obviously dazzled by their record. Unlike the stock markets.

Boucher's dismal career at the B of I merited an early bath in 2008 -- immediate retirement without a six-figure compensation package. Instead, he was promoted. He became the overall boss in 2009. His appointment was described by current minister Joan Burton as "a missed opportunity to signal a new development in the banking sector". Boucher is one of the old guard.

Businessman Dermot Desmond expressed his "dismay" at Boucher's elevation, demanding a clean break.

He said Boucher must have been responsible for "serious errors of judgment, including advancing loans to developers on the strength of overstated land values and insufficient security".

Desmond's fears were borne out. The share price has tanked under Boucher.

Boucher joined Bank of Ireland in 2003 and was made a full board director in 2006. He was head of B of I's Irish retail division and oversaw much of its land bank and development loans when they grew to €7.1bn. There is no record of him ever having held up his hand against the property madness.

'Sean FitzPatrick and Michael Fingleton are perfectly fit to run banks'

Less than three months before September 30, 2008 -- the day of disaster -- Boucher told an Oireachtas committee: "Unequivocally, we do not think that there is a Northern Rock in Ireland."

He went on: "We do not believe that we have capital problems. The issues that we face are more down to liquidity, rather than capital."

Echoes of former Financial Regulator Paddy Neary, who claimed that all the Irish banks were well capitalised, even as the foundations of the financial system were visibly shaking. Paddy lost his head for his trouble.

The Central Bank launched its review of bank directors, painting itself as the regulator that was going to change the system.

It was expected to clear out those who shared responsibility for the fiasco leading up to the property/banking collapse.

None have faced penalties. Some have been rewarded with massive redundancy packages. The survivors have been found fit for office.

The new Central Bank is an old paper tiger.
Boston Bruin
(131 Posts)
Posted: 01-Jul-2012 19:46
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Originally posted by Larkin:
I know Ross was one of Fitzpatricks cheerleaders but it's hard to disagree with what he says here.Shane Ross: Remember, none of this catastrophe is the fault of bankers
WHAT A BANKER: While Richie Boucher became a millionaire, Bank of Ireland shareholders were being ruinedBy Shane Ross
Sunday July 01 2012COME back, Brian Goggin, Eugene Sheehy, Sean FitzPatrick, David Drumm, Michael Fingleton, Dermot Gleeson and Richard Burrows. All is forgiven. What a terrible misunderstanding.The banking collapse was not your fault. It was an awful mistake. You did not lend recklessly. You are perfectly fit to run a bank.On Thursday the Central Bank gave the all-clear to the surviving ghosts of the banking holocaust, the bankers who came through the 2008 massacre of Ireland's banks, the slaughter of small shareholders, the penury of taxpayers and the crippled Irish economy.Two guys who sat tight through the disaster, in which they were active participants, have been told to continue doing what they do worst -- run bankrupt banks.Richie Boucher,chief executive of Bank of Ireland, and Kevin Murphy, retiring chief executive of Irish Life, have been cleared by the Central Bank as suitable guys to continue in the careers which they have pursued with such disastrous consequences for Ireland.No one is saying that either Boucher or Murphy are dishonest. Far from it. But they are rich, very rich. Boucher receives a €690,000-a-year package. They have been made even richer since the banking Armageddon of 2008.While Boucher and Murphy became millionaires, their shareholders were being ruined. Bank of Ireland's share price has fallen from over €18 to Friday's level of just nine cent. Their dividends are no more.Boucher was a director throughout the collapse. He was chief executive while much of the slaughter of his innocent shareholders was happening.Irish Life's share price fell from a high of €22.80 in 2007 to Friday's level of just two cent while Kevin was a director. A board member since 1999, he was made chief executive in June 2009. The Central Bank has found that the duo are appropriate people to stay in the saddle.Are they joking ?Sadly not. The freshly tamed Central Bank is obviously dazzled by their record. Unlike the stock markets.Boucher's dismal career at the B of I merited an early bath in 2008 -- immediate retirement without a six-figure compensation package. Instead, he was promoted. He became the overall boss in 2009. His appointment was described by current minister Joan Burton as "a missed opportunity to signal a new development in the banking sector". Boucher is one of the old guard.Businessman Dermot Desmond expressed his "dismay" at Boucher's elevation, demanding a clean break.He said Boucher must have been responsible for "serious errors of judgment, including advancing loans to developers on the strength of overstated land values and insufficient security".Desmond's fears were borne out. The share price has tanked under Boucher.Boucher joined Bank of Ireland in 2003 and was made a full board director in 2006. He was head of B of I's Irish retail division and oversaw much of its land bank and development loans when they grew to €7.1bn. There is no record of him ever having held up his hand against the property madness.'Sean FitzPatrick and Michael Fingleton are perfectly fit to run banks'Less than three months before September 30, 2008 -- the day of disaster -- Boucher told an Oireachtas committee: "Unequivocally, we do not think that there is a Northern Rock in Ireland."He went on: "We do not believe that we have capital problems. The issues that we face are more down to liquidity, rather than capital."Echoes of former Financial Regulator Paddy Neary, who claimed that all the Irish banks were well capitalised, even as the foundations of the financial system were visibly shaking. Paddy lost his head for his trouble.The Central Bank launched its review of bank directors, painting itself as the regulator that was going to change the system.It was expected to clear out those who shared responsibility for the fiasco leading up to the property/banking collapse.None have faced penalties. Some have been rewarded with massive redundancy packages. The survivors have been found fit for office.The new Central Bank is an old paper tiger.

While Ross talks a lot of sense, he was saying around 2004/2005 that BOI were being to conservative in their lending strategy and would be left behind by the likes of Anglo.
"Speak Out!" Home  |  Topic Listing  |  Post New Topic  |  Post Reply
Content Zone
‘We talk just like lions, but we sacrifice like lambs…’.
Whatever Happened to….
Anyone you know in your club?
Bin Tags Don't Make a County
‘Some a’ Dem’ Lads are only Dow-en for the Showers….’
Heavenly Hurling: How the Gods pass their time...
GAA Time and Real Time
Saint Patrick and the camogie princesses
Keats and Chapman at the Munster Final
Mass, the Mater, ‘The Dergvale’ and Mullingar…

More "Content Zone" Topics >>


Speak Out!

More "Speak Out!" Topics >>

There are 10,277 members signed up to anfearrua.com
All times are Dublin, Ireland. Always here... with the best in GAA discussion and comment! © An Fear Rua, 2000 - 2013
Bookmark AFR  |  Make AFR your home page About Us  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use [ Top of Page ]