Mobile Version  |  Register  |  Login
home  |  speak out!  |  content zone archives  |  "speak out!" archives  |  vote on it  |  soap opera  |  pub crawl  |  links  |  contact us  |  search  
 Follow us! 
Speak Out! - Other Topics
Notices
"Speak Out!" Home  |  Topic Listing  |  Post New Topic  |  Post Reply
Yesterday's HOT topics  |  Today's HOT topics
 |  Jump to:  
First 1 2 Last
Select a page:   PageSize:   Page 1 of 2
Topic: Public servants’ sick pay hit
Hitch
(3,644 Posts)
Posted: 19-Jul-2012 20:13
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply


THE amount of sick leave that public servants can take on full pay is being halved.

New rules mean that about 300,000 state employees who are not critically ill will only get three months on full wages, followed by three months on half pay.

Currently, they are entitled to up to six months full pay followed by six months half pay when they have a medical cert.

After this, they get a rate of pay based on their pensions and there is no time limit on this.

However, the new scheme announced today means that they will only be able to claim this ‘temporary rehabilitation pay’ for up to two years.

Those who are critically ill will hold onto their existing entitlements under the new scheme.

They will continue to get six months on full pay and six months on half pay.

However, the new long term sick leave arrangements - which got Labour Court backing today - will not be in place for over a year.

Sick leave costs the State €550m per annum.

- Anne-Marie Walsh

_______________________________________

Is this in line with the CP agreement?
ProjX
(726 Posts)
Posted: 19-Jul-2012 20:27
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
But if the public servants were genuinely sick, then this will not affect the numbers out sick?

Unless of course some public servants were not genuinely sick? In that case they should be convicted of stealing from the state and imprisoned like the criminals they are.

Cusack Park
(640 Posts)
Posted: 19-Jul-2012 20:49
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
this is only the start of it, these Public Sector leeches are in for a rude awakening over the next 3 budgets
jack daw
(357 Posts)
Posted: 19-Jul-2012 20:58
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Originally posted by Cusack Park:
this is only the start of it, these Public Sector leeches are in for a rude awakening over the next 3 budgets

I wouldent be holding my breath re social welfare cuts, one of the FG lackeys was on matt coopers show today, and he was at pains to point out that the IMF criteria in relation to child benefit cuts etc was only a 'suggestion'! In other words , they dont have the balls or the guts to follow through on these welfare cuts, instead expect the usual suspects, ie PAYE income tax payers or sufferers to get rammed as usual, if not directly then indirectly thru hiked taxes on motor fuel and road tax, things that wont affect the stay at home work shy welfare scroungers in other words!

HitemHardHardHard
(1,498 Posts)
Posted: 19-Jul-2012 21:01
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Ah Lads, you would swear a private sector worker never threw a sickie..You mightnt have noticed that the Unions have not objected to this. Defending the indefensible is not in the unions interest.
What this article didn't say, and ye didn't have the co-op to spot is that the sick pay is now being limited to full pay for 3 months in four years.. were it used to be full pay for six months in 5 years!
So in fact the change isn't that great.
It appears that the Health sector is the problem.

jbrown
(421 Posts)
Posted: 19-Jul-2012 21:11
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Originally posted by jack daw:
I wouldent be holding my breath re social welfare cuts, one of the FG lackeys was on matt coopers show today, and he was at pains to point out that the IMF criteria in relation to child benefit cuts etc was only a 'suggestion'! In other words , they dont have the balls or the guts to follow through on these welfare cuts, instead expect the usual suspects, ie PAYE income tax payers or sufferers to get rammed as usual, if not directly then indirectly thru hiked taxes on motor fuel and road tax, things that wont affect the stay at home work shy welfare scroungers in other words!

They want to be seen to be leaving tax rates and bands, and headline social welfare rates the same.

There will be trimming around the edges, back to school allowance, school transport, possibly something like a PRSI rate being deducted from social welfare and an adjustment in PRSI Bands etc.

This probably will be the most savage budget yet, as it's coming near to election time so they won't want to be seen to be too harsh next time out.
Pog Mahone
(9,387 Posts)
Posted: 19-Jul-2012 21:12
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Good measures from what I can see, attacks the malingerers and appears to protect those who are genuinely ill.
model fan
(520 Posts)
Posted: 20-Jul-2012 09:29
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Semi state sector should be the next target, I know a Bus Eireann driver who claims he has to take his full qouta of non certified sick days every year under pressure from his work colleagues. Not that it is any problem for him he is a willing participant, considers it part of his leave allotment, he once told me that his job was so stressful that he needed the days.
The Remnant
(63 Posts)
Posted: 20-Jul-2012 09:54
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Can't see this making a pile of difference but it's a small step in the right direction.
To be honest, I forsee the next budget again targeting Income tax or using indirect taxes such as property tax (possible major increase) & Fuel tax.
The government knows what needs to be done and so do most people living in the real world. Public Sector needs to be reformed in a massive way -sounds straight forward; however the government are not going to do this. They know they will lose alot of their electorate and most of all, lets not forget they are part of the public sector themselves. They are not going to make the cuts to their staff working along side them day in day out.
Social Welfare cuts - not going to happen in any great significance. Reason - Votes - they would lose too many votes.

The problem is, if they keep hitting the average worker, it will reach a point where it is not worth their while putting in a 40 hour week. I get the sense that the average private sector worker more than anyone is starting to feel enough is enough.

The government talks about job creation. They have not done one thing to help small and medium companies. Simple things like access to credit are near impossible for these companies. All the government is concerned about is looking after and bringing in these big multi-nationals. Dont get me wrong, this is great but look after the little guys too.

Cré Na Cille
(899 Posts)
Posted: 20-Jul-2012 10:54
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Taken from from here

So the labour court has agreed that the government can adjust and cut the sick leave allowances of 300,000 public servants. The old “allowance” was 7 uncertified sick days per a mum and this will now be reduced to the same per 24 months. Also the time on full pay will be cut from 6 to 3 months and same for half pay.
We’re told that the total sick pay bill comes to €500m (out of €14,000m) and that thus this will save €250m. The reforms are welcome but will they in fact save that? It seems to me several issues need to be noted. First, of the total the vast majority was for certified sick days only some €60m being for uncertified sick days. So we might save 30m here IF and only IF people were malingering and taking sikies to which they were not entitled.
Second, when people go from full to 1/2 pay (as they will do now more swiftly) they will in many cases get some social welfare. So while the sick pay element of aome €440m will fall the social welfare bill will rise by an unspecified amount. Some data on that would be nice.
Third, much gloating and pointing has been evident from the usual suspects on this issue. The typical cry is “lookit – all them lazy gits in the public sector on the sick”. One wonders what the comparative figures are for comparable private sector posts? Perhaps 3.5% of the overall budget is not unusual? Or Maybe it is. Comparable data again would be nice.
Fourth we need to compare like with like. A breakdown of this pay bill by sector would help. Defense and policing are inherently physical jobs where the chance of serious injury (and thus sick pay) is significant. Health sector frontline workers face similar issues with the added exposure to all sort of sicknesses. Again, a higher level of sickness than the workforce at large is inevitable.
The changes are welcome but let’s not get carried away either with the levels of sick pay or the savings. Not that that will stop those for whom the public sector represents a bottomless pit of sloth…
This message has been edited - 20-jul-2012 @ 10:55
jaykeane
(102 Posts)
Posted: 20-Jul-2012 11:14
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Originally posted by HitemHardHardHard:
Ah Lads, you would swear a private sector worker never threw a sickie..You mightnt have noticed that the Unions have not objected to this. Defending the indefensible is not in the unions interest.
What this article didn't say, and ye didn't have the co-op to spot is that the sick pay is now being limited to full pay for 3 months in four years.. were it used to be full pay for six months in 5 years!
So in fact the change isn't that great.
It appears that the Health sector is the problem.

What the f**k are you on about you imbecile ?? I am a private sector worker and guess what if I am out sick I don’t get paid. I don’t have any problem with it either , why should I expect my employer to pay me while I am at home and not working?. The sense of entitlement public sector workers have makes my blood boil and yes it is me through my PAYE & my employer through PRSI who is paying some c**t in the public sector to go shopping or go to a wedding for the day.
centreforward
(589 Posts)
Posted: 20-Jul-2012 11:32
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Originally posted by Cré Na Cille:
We’re told that the total sick pay bill comes to €500m (out of €14,000m) and that thus this will save €250m. The reforms are welcome but will they in fact save that?

It's hard to have hope for this country when the powers that be come up with figures like that. Just cause you half the sick days "allowance", doesn't mean you automatically half what these sick days cost the state. We'll be lucky to get €80m - €100m saving out of this.

Bagger Vance
(99 Posts)
Posted: 20-Jul-2012 11:41
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Originally posted by jaykeane:
What the f**k are you on about you imbecile ?? I am a private sector worker and guess what if I am out sick I don’t get paid. I don’t have any problem with it either , why should I expect my employer to pay me while I am at home and not working?. The sense of entitlement public sector workers have makes my blood boil and yes it is me through my PAYE & my employer through PRSI who is paying some c**t in the public sector to go shopping or go to a wedding for the day.

Well said Jay, these lads are clowns. Don't let it get to ya though or you'll get stressed and sick and have to go into hospital where you could pick up any number or diseases or infections and wait for staff who are pulling sickies and out shopping in newry.

HitemHardHardHard
(1,498 Posts)
Posted: 20-Jul-2012 11:43
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Cool the Jets Jaykeane.....I'm not an imbicile and this isn't a windup, but seem awful easy to wind up!! If I was trying you would explode!

An entitlement is something that is written in a contract, its called condition of service and it goes both ways. Weak management is a problem but so are p***ks that ride the system. I haven't missed a days work in 8 years.

Of course there is Private sector self employed and private sector employed. I have a family memeber out sick from work and she is getting paid. Huh?

If you go sick you are going to get sick pay if your employer puts it through the Social welfare payment, it may depend on your PRSI class. The government threatened to change this recently to make the employer pay and the Private sector employers went nuts and rightfully so.

By the way the Public sector is not an excusive club, you can apply for a job in it anytime you want if something comes up. If things are that brilliant you should do every think you can to get a job. I love Thursday weddings; YOu get to go sick for two days...It's not real work...spot the wind up...
onthesod
(28 Posts)
Posted: 20-Jul-2012 11:52
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Am a public sector worker and I think these changes are badly needed. However, I do agree that somebody who is genuinely ill should be accomodated. If you are not ill and don't want to work, stay at home and let somebody who would be glad of the job do it. However, there are always situations where long standing illness will be a player. I work with a lady, in her 50s with about 25yrs+ experience in a technical job, that has Crohns disease, she had been hospitalised alot but lives for her job and is very good at it. This is where the water gets muddy, in cases like hers, you remove her from the job, lose her experience and ability.

The story about the guy taking his full 'allotment' of sick days for the year, in my experience, is rampant, particularly in the health service. While in College, I managed to get a job with maintenance unit in a large hospital for 10 weeks. Whilst there, I encountered a lot of the auxiliary staff i.e. domestic help, attendants etc, Sickies amongst these grades was RIFE, they even had their own little rota for weekends so that one would take a sickie on a friday and somebody else on the following monday, both ended up with a 3 day weekend, others were brought in on overtime to cover. Neither were sick (apart from hangover)and 2 days wages were paid for 1 days work.. Ridiculous. It made my blood boil. Most commonly, the worst offenders were unionised to the ears, would not do a tap whilst at work and if pulled up on it would claim harassment and threaten strike. Unions are a lot of the reason why we are in the mess we are in, they are largely a pyramid scheme where the members (minions) pay fees for parasitic fat cat salaries (a la Jack O Connor) at the top. Unions will ever only represent the views of the powerful few and are only as productive as their laziest member. Do we need them? Surely our employment law is strong enough to stand on its own, rather than the mob rule of the unions.
This message has been edited - 20-jul-2012 @ 12:02
manfromdelmonte
(2,268 Posts)
Posted: 20-Jul-2012 12:31
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
As a teacher I have never taken an uncertified days sick leave
There, I said it.
In fact i've missed maybe 2 days in 5 years due to actual illness.

The fact is, the cost of hiring a sub teacher to cover maternity leave is included in the cost. That is hardly sick pay?
If they spent a little money in getting more males into teaching then they would reduce the sick pay bill
Hitch
(3,644 Posts)
Posted: 20-Jul-2012 13:10
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Originally posted by manfromdelmonte:
As a teacher I have never taken an uncertified days sick leave
There, I said it.
In fact i've missed maybe 2 days in 5 years due to actual illness. l

Not good enough. Must try harder. Capable of much better. 6/10


The Jedi
(214 Posts)
Posted: 20-Jul-2012 13:33
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
I worked in a county council many moons ago. I was complaining about having no holidays left and Xmas coming up.
My manager said and I quote "How many sickdays have you left?". Seems I had 6 and I obliged and took 3 for Xmas no questions asked.
The same man is now a very senior manager on bug bucks, Maybe he deserves it for the 20 tough hours he works weekly...
I left after 15 months. Some would consider it a bad move, I don't.
An Carta Bui
(277 Posts)
Posted: 20-Jul-2012 13:50
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Of course our private sector employees are the model of efficency and professionalism. Thank God I was able to line up a Polish crew to sort out a few jobs for me.
I'd still be waiting for "I'd only be interested in a cash price" Irish crew to do it
The Pope of Chilli Town
(14 Posts)
Posted: 20-Jul-2012 14:04
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Wasn't there a recent survey performed by a radio station (Newstalk, I think) where one of the reporters asked a series of doctors to provide her with a sick cert even though she admitted that she was fine? 7 out of 10 doctors stumped up the cert, no questions asked. If somebody has health insurance, they get the vast majority of the doctor's fee back so for a small outlay, people can get a sick cert anyway. This is true for both public and private sectors.

I do think that the new rules are a step in the right direction but tightening up on existing rules would help. My brother-in-law needs to provide a sick cert if he is out for i) two consecutive days, ii) more than 7 inconsecutive days in a year and iii) if he is sick on a Friday or a Monday. This seems like common sense to me.
twohandsonthehurl
(128 Posts)
Posted: 20-Jul-2012 15:07
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
In related news, I see schools in England are only finishing up today for their summer holidays. Our national schools have been closed for a month already.
Can somebody explain why, in 2012, our pupils / teachers are off for a month extra than our nearest neighbours?
irishmagic
(1,944 Posts)
Posted: 20-Jul-2012 15:09
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Originally posted by The Remnant:
Can't see this making a pile of difference but it's a small step in the right direction.
To be honest, I forsee the next budget again targeting Income tax or using indirect taxes such as property tax (possible major increase) & Fuel tax.
The government knows what needs to be done and so do most people living in the real world. Public Sector needs to be reformed in a massive way -sounds straight forward; however the government are not going to do this. They know they will lose alot of their electorate and most of all, lets not forget they are part of the public sector themselves. They are not going to make the cuts to their staff working along side them day in day out.
Social Welfare cuts - not going to happen in any great significance. Reason - Votes - they would lose too many votes.The problem is, if they keep hitting the average worker, it will reach a point where it is not worth their while putting in a 40 hour week. I get the sense that the average private sector worker more than anyone is starting to feel enough is enough.The government talks about job creation. They have not done one thing to help small and medium companies. Simple things like access to credit are near impossible for these companies. All the government is concerned about is looking after and bringing in these big multi-nationals. Dont get me wrong, this is great but look after the little guys too.

+1 great post
dubliner 2
(10,823 Posts)
Posted: 20-Jul-2012 16:03
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Originally posted by twohandsonthehurl:
In related news, I see schools in England are only finishing up today for their summer holidays. Our national schools have been closed for a month already.
Can somebody explain why, in 2012, our pupils / teachers are off for a month extra than our nearest neighbours?

They are not. The school year in Britain is 190 days. It is 183 days in Ireland. The British year is longer because they take longer holidays at certain points of the year including a ten day break around the June Bank Holiday. The majority of EU countries do the same and have about 190 days in their school year. See the following link for details.

http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/calendars/102_school_calendar_EN.pdf

There is also no minimum amount of hours that a school has to be open for in Britain, unlike here, where primary schools must offer a minimum of 25 hours instruction and a secondary school a minimum of 27.5 hours per week. These minimums are the close to being the highest in the EU. Added to that almost all other EU countries include all extra work like prep/correcting/extra curricular in the hours teachers are expected to work to come out at an average of about 1200 hours per year. We don't, which means the figure of 726 hours gets thrown around a lot. That is class contact time only and does not include all the other work that teachers have to do which is included by other countries.

Maybe a little research before you come on talking s///hite.

On topic I've no issue with changes to sick leave. I've never taken an uncertified day in twenty years and don't intend to in the future.
This message has been edited - 20-jul-2012 @ 16:05
Tippsy McStagger
(115 Posts)
Posted: 20-Jul-2012 16:27
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Originally posted by The Pope of Chilli Town:
Wasn't there a recent survey performed by a radio station (Newstalk, I think) where one of the reporters asked a series of doctors to provide her with a sick cert even though she admitted that she was fine? 7 out of 10 doctors stumped up the cert, no questions asked.

Typical private sector - they only care about how much money they can get.

Boston Bruin
(131 Posts)
Posted: 20-Jul-2012 17:07
Quote   Edit   Delete   Report Post   Post Reply
Originally posted by dubliner 2:
They are not. The school year in Britain is 190 days. It is 183 days in Ireland. The British year is longer because they take longer holidays at certain points of the year including a ten day break around the June Bank Holiday. The majority of EU countries do the same and have about 190 days in their school year. See the following link for details.http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/calendars/102_school_calendar_EN.pdfThere is also no minimum amount of hours that a school has to be open for in Britain, unlike here, where primary schools must offer a minimum of 25 hours instruction and a secondary school a minimum of 27.5 hours per week. These minimums are the close to being the highest in the EU. Added to that almost all other EU countries include all extra work like prep/correcting/extra curricular in the hours teachers are expected to work to come out at an average of about 1200 hours per year. We don't, which means the figure of 726 hours gets thrown around a lot. That is class contact time only and does not include all the other work that teachers have to do which is included by other countries.Maybe a little research before you come on talking s///hite.On topic I've no issue with changes to sick leave. I've never taken an uncertified day in twenty years and don't intend to in the future.

But, Do other EU countries pay their teachers a premium for being qualified to do the job in the first place? Do they pay them a premium for supervision? Do they pay them a premium for marking exams? Do they pay them a blanket, across the board pay increase every year without questions asked? Do they remove incompetent teachers from the workplace?

First 1 2 Last
Select a page:   Page 1 of 2
"Speak Out!" Home  |  Topic Listing  |  Post New Topic  |  Post Reply
Content Zone
‘We talk just like lions, but we sacrifice like lambs…’.
Whatever Happened to….
Anyone you know in your club?
Bin Tags Don't Make a County
‘Some a’ Dem’ Lads are only Dow-en for the Showers….’
Heavenly Hurling: How the Gods pass their time...
GAA Time and Real Time
Saint Patrick and the camogie princesses
Keats and Chapman at the Munster Final
Mass, the Mater, ‘The Dergvale’ and Mullingar…

More "Content Zone" Topics >>


Speak Out!

More "Speak Out!" Topics >>

There are 10,277 members signed up to anfearrua.com
All times are Dublin, Ireland. Always here... with the best in GAA discussion and comment! © An Fear Rua, 2000 - 2026
Bookmark AFR  |  Make AFR your home page About Us  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use [ Top of Page ]