Mobile Version
|
Register
|
Login
home
|
speak out!
|
content zone archives
|
"speak out!" archives
|
vote on it
|
soap opera
|
pub crawl
|
links
|
contact us
|
search
Follow us!
Speak Out! - Gaelic Games
Notices
"Speak Out!" Home
|
Topic Listing
|
Post New Topic
|
Post Reply
Yesterday's HOT topics
|
Today's HOT topics
| Jump to:
All Topics
First
1
2
3
Last
Select a page:
1
2
3
PageSize:
10
25
50
Page
1
of
3
Topic:
Do you think hurling has become a mess and what is the future of our game?
Anyone but FF
(1,490 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 00:00
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
Lads its very intresting reading the reaction to Sundays game here over the last two days and its also been very intresting listening to lads (both hurling and non hurling men) at work discussing it over the last 48 hours. Personally ive made it clear on a few occasions here that I don't like the direction the game has taken in the last 5 or 6 years, I say that as both a fan and a club player.
I saw hurling being described as lawless in yesterdays Irish Examiner and you know I found myself agreeing with that description, the sledging, the frontal hits, the off ball stuff, the pulling and dragging, the hurley around the neck and face, the chopping and the wild pulling are all more prominent now then they were a decade ago. Now its easy to say the game has evolved and it has but the rulebook hasn't and what was a foul back then should in theory still be a foul today, I know I will have the "its a mans game" brigade shouting me down here but I say to them that hurling was always a mans game before any of this "let the game flow" carry on was introduced. Men like Brendan Lynskey, John Power, Brian Corcoran, Ollie Baker all flourished and were revered in our game as hardened or tough competitors so where, when and why did some hurling people suddenly decide hurling wasnt hard enough??
I have no doubt that Brian Cody (Why is a current manager on the rules commitee) and his KK team were chief instigators in this laxing of the rules but other teams have copped on and realised that they can push the limits as well. The Dubs last year were as physical a hurling team as iv seen up close, Waterford under Davy were more about physicality then skill, Galway were no angels in the Leinster final and we wont even get started on Tipps antics last Sunday. My own Cork while lagging behind in the science of the "dark arts" seem to have woken up to the fact that hurling now is governed more by guidelines rather then rules and as a result their has been a notable change in the refereeing standards down here over the course of this summer with much more being left go.
Where is it all going to end up and what is becoming of hurling, In my own view we are only a few years away from seeing someone been taken from the field in a neck brace or with a bit of a finger missing as a result of foul play. Michael Rice's injury last Sunday was a terrible injury from what I thought was a foul but sure as is the norm these days its just brushed under the carpet with "its a mans game".
Lads including myself are bemoaning the fall in attendences in recent seasons, The recession has an awful lot to do with it I know, but talking to a casual sunshine fan today he said "did it ever dawn on you hurling lads that yer game isnt as enjoyable to watch now as it was a few years back" Hes right you know, hurling is quickly resembling wrestling with sticks and its turning a lot of people off our sport. Tipp and KK lads will shout me down now as they claim im jealous as this change in the game has come during their reign as top dogs (and yes I am jealous of yer success, not jealous of yer current brand of hurling though).
Hurling has two options I think. Implement the rules of the game, re train referees and "punish" referees who "let the game flow" or else simply re write the rule book if the majority of people want the game to be played as it currently is.
The way things are going by 2020 hurling will be almost
unrecognizable to the hurling of the ninetys and early to mid noughties!
bosco32
(606 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 00:27
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
Well said. Sums my frustrations of the last few years up exactly.
theblack&amber
(593 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 00:31
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
its very funny how hurling has degenerated (it hasn't) in the opinion of some only in the last 5/6 years.
Curiously around the same time as Kilkenny started dominating. funny that. Or is it begrudgery?
staycalm
(1,081 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 00:34
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
Originally posted by theblack&amber:
its very funny how hurling has degenerated (it hasn't) in the opinion of some only in the last 5/6 years.Curiously around the same time as Kilkenny started dominating. funny that. Or is it begrudgery?
I blame Fianna Fáil
bosco32
(606 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 00:35
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
Originally posted by theblack&amber:
its very funny how hurling has degenerated (it hasn't) in the opinion of some only in the last 5/6 years.Curiously around the same time as Kilkenny started dominating. funny that. Or is it begrudgery?
Or are you paranoid?
Kilkenny have been dominating hurling for most of the last 15 years in case you hadn't noticed.
And not everyone thinks of their county first and foremost when discussing the game. Take off your jersey and then discuss with the adults please.
Anyone but FF
(1,490 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 00:43
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
Originally posted by theblack&amber:
its very funny how hurling has degenerated (it hasn't) in the opinion of some only in the last 5/6 years.Curiously around the same time as Kilkenny started dominating. funny that. Or is it begrudgery?
KK won 3 All Irelands in 4 years at the start of this century and no one was saying hurling had degenerated then. Take 2002 for example, a year that ye won the All Ireland and my own Cork werent worth a sh!te. The hurling that year was much more skillfull and enjoyable and less cynical then anything served up in recent seasons in my opinon!
uncle betty
(45 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 01:23
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
wtf is the story with the editing function on this forum ? ? ?
stretchitoutlads
(269 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 01:23
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
If Tipp won on Sunday and if the the Lar/Tommy/Pa/Jackie comedy show hadn't gone ahead, would this thread exist?
Anyone but FF
(1,490 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 01:41
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
Originally posted by stretchitoutlads:
If Tipp won on Sunday and if the the Lar/Tommy/Pa/Jackie comedy show hadn't gone ahead, would this thread exist?
If Tipp had managed to win on Sunday with their attempted "rough em up" tactics then hurling would be much the poorer for it. As for the Lar and Tommy comedy show I didn't see much wrong with it, A ridiculous farce of a tactic for sure but other then the sheer stupidity of it a forward following a back arond its not against the rules.
Leave last Sundays game out of it so for a minute as it was a real low point in my opinon of what hurling has become. When lads take off their county colours for a minute (thats if some of ye are able) do ye honestly think hurling isnt been dragged into the gutter by the laissez-faire attitude of referees, the top brass in Croke Park and some media "pundits" towards the rules of our game??
The Serb
(110 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 01:42
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
Brilliantly summed up. I agree with you totally. Its quite laughable the way some paranoid Kilkenny supporters think nobody would say anything if Tipp won on Sunday. The people like you and me who are voicing our concern over the way the game is going dont care who win as long as the game of hurling wins but thanks to present day tactics, lack of rule enforcement ect., the game as a spectacle is deteriorating. We are not anti Kilkenny. The Cork, Kilkenny finals in the early noughties were great games of hurling with very little negative tactics and Kilkenny won all Irelands during this time. Cody has to be got off this rules committee if things are to be judged fairly. By all accounts the man is a bit of a dictator who doesnt take too kindly to democracy!!
Originally posted by Anyone but FF:
Lads its very intresting reading the reaction to Sundays game here over the last two days and its also been very intresting listening to lads (both hurling and non hurling men) at work discussing it over the last 48 hours. Personally ive made it clear on a few occasions here that I don't like the direction the game has taken in the last 5 or 6 years, I say that as both a fan and a club player.I saw hurling being described as lawless in yesterdays Irish Examiner and you know I found myself agreeing with that description, the sledging, the frontal hits, the off ball stuff, the pulling and dragging, the hurley around the neck and face, the chopping and the wild pulling are all more prominent now then they were a decade ago. Now its easy to say the game has evolved and it has but the rulebook hasn't and what was a foul back then should in theory still be a foul today, I know I will have the "its a mans game" brigade shouting me down here but I say to them that hurling was always a mans game before any of this "let the game flow" carry on was introduced. Men like Brendan Lynskey, John Power, Brian Corcoran, Ollie Baker all flourished and were revered in our game as hardened or tough competitors so where, when and why did some hurling people suddenly decide hurling wasnt hard enough??I have no doubt that Brian Cody (Why is a current manager on the rules commitee) and his KK team were chief instigators in this laxing of the rules but other teams have copped on and realised that they can push the limits as well. The Dubs last year were as physical a hurling team as iv seen up close, Waterford under Davy were more about physicality then skill, Galway were no angels in the Leinster final and we wont even get started on Tipps antics last Sunday. My own Cork while lagging behind in the science of the "dark arts" seem to have woken up to the fact that hurling now is governed more by guidelines rather then rules and as a result their has been a notable change in the refereeing standards down here over the course of this summer with much more being left go.Where is it all going to end up and what is becoming of hurling, In my own view we are only a few years away from seeing someone been taken from the field in a neck brace or with a bit of a finger missing as a result of foul play. Michael Rice's injury last Sunday was a terrible injury from what I thought was a foul but sure as is the norm these days its just brushed under the carpet with "its a mans game".Lads including myself are bemoaning the fall in attendences in recent seasons, The recession has an awful lot to do with it I know, but talking to a casual sunshine fan today he said "did it ever dawn on you hurling lads that yer game isnt as enjoyable to watch now as it was a few years back" Hes right you know, hurling is quickly resembling wrestling with sticks and its turning a lot of people off our sport. Tipp and KK lads will shout me down now as they claim im jealous as this change in the game has come during their reign as top dogs (and yes I am jealous of yer success, not jealous of yer current brand of hurling though).Hurling has two options I think. Implement the rules of the game, re train referees and "punish" referees who "let the game flow" or else simply re write the rule book if the majority of people want the game to be played as it currently is.The way things are going by 2020 hurling will be almost
unrecognizable to the hurling of the ninetys and early to mid noughties!
Squirrel Farrell
(1,010 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 01:52
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
Referees are allowing fouls to go unpunished but this doesn't lend itself to 'letting the game flow'. In the long term it actually makes games more congested and scrappy as fouls, such as pulling a lads arm when striking a ball or trying to pick it up, go unpunished and the play becomes disjointed as everyone tries to pick the ball and walk through the ruck.
If these fouls were stamped out the messy, physical play that we are seeing would become more difficult to create. Sure we would have a few games decided by a free-taking shoot-out but it might serve the game of hurling better in the long term. Referees need to be brave though and, most importantly, consistent.
uncle betty
(45 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 01:59
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
I saw hurling being described as lawless in yesterdays Irish Examiner and you know I found myself agreeing with that description, the sledging, the frontal hits, the off ball stuff, the pulling and dragging, the hurley around the neck and face, the chopping and the wild pulling are all more prominent now then they were a decade ago. Now its easy to say the game has evolved and it has but the rulebook hasn't and what was a foul back then should in theory still be a foul today,
If hurling is lawless it is not because those things are happening. They have always been in it. There have always been hatchetmen and downright psychos.
Well, it is a man's game to the extent that neither Rice nor Reid, nor Tommy Walsh in 2009, made anything whatsoever out of those incidents, nor sought to have an opposition player sent off, nor fist-pumped at the sight of a card being shown.
And by the way - no-one was more loudly heard in the ''it's a man's game'' corner last Sunday than... Tomas Mulcahy. He of the fabled land where the dark arts are as yet not fully understood.
a casual sunshine fan today he said "did it ever dawn on you hurling lads that yer game isnt as enjoyable to watch now as it was a few years back"
He's an idiot. If he exists.
This is not to say that the game is perfect. It isn't.
The loss of the skill of first time on the ground hurling is the worst possible disaster I can think of.
The ball is still faster than the man, and whipping it away obviates the need for about 90% of the pulling and dragging that goes on, with five or six lads trying to rise it in a forest of feet and hurleys.
Now, if we were to trace the genealogy of all of that evolution in the game - tippy tappy up the field with ball in hand at all costs... where would we find the answer ?
ps Sylvie would just pull, and tough sh1t if your ankles were in his way. Dead right.
uncle betty
(45 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 02:02
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
YET AGAIN, HALF MY POST IS MISSING.
WHEN I GO TO THE EDIT FUNCTION, ALL THE ORIGINAL POST IS THERE IN THE TEXT.
WHAT'S IT ALL ABOUT, ALFIE ?
uncle betty
(45 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 02:25
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
One last go - will try to summarise my other points, as I think the quote function is ballsing it up for me.
1. As regards your list of ''hardened or tough'' competitors - Sylvie Linnane seems only the MOST glaring omission, for some reason.
2. You have no doubts about Cody and his team's role in relaxing the rules ? !
Is this becasue you have a blind prejudice about it, or because you have evidence. I hope the latter, because it;s a serious thing to say and I would not like it to be true.
3. The Dubs were as physical a team as you have seen up close, and Davy with Waterford was more about physicalitty that skill...
There is a very, very significant Clare influence there, which pre-dates Cody's tenure as manager. I could make that case with more evidence than you have used to back up YOUR insinuation.
4. Michael Rice's injury.
This is the problem I have with your attitude towards Cody and his ''team'' - ultimately you are insinuating that Cody is putting his own players at risk of career-theatening injuries, as a consequence of undue influence he allegedly has over a committee.
Do you think Rice blames Cody ? IF the Reid incident had turned out to be serious, do you think he would be blaming Cody ?
labane1917
(1,438 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 02:44
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
Hurling has always been a difficult and almost impossible game to referee. The speed of the game makes it very difficult to keep up with play let alone monitor what is going on off the ball. It is uniquely Irish and very much played "on the edge" historically. Throughout its history the game has been officiated and controlled largely by the discipline of the players. It is also a very dangerous game and serious injuries can occur (much more serious than you mentioned), either accidently or deliberately. I know of 3 men who sustained skull fractures from deliberate strikes to the head, two of whom were airlifted to hospital for emergency surgery. None of the three ever played the game again and one was left with permanent brain damage. All were young men in their 20s at the time. None of the perpetrators were ever held accountable by the authorities mainly because of the code of silence in GAA culture.
I have zero tolerance for deliberate striking and dirty play in general although I am in the "man's game" camp. Those that do not understand the difference between hard fair hurling and dirty hurling do not understand hurling and have no business commenting on it. I would be in favor of two referees, one in each half, to keep an eye on what is going on both on the ball and off the ball. There is nothing wrong with a bit of jostling and joulting between players, it has been going on since the game began and players expect it. They do not expect to be struck with a hurley when unable to defend themselves. There is also nothing wrong with surrounding a player in possession and forcing him to give up possession. The answer to swarm defense is a fast paced high skill game where the ball is kept moving at speed. Skill will always beat brawn as has been proven time and time again, a lesson Tipperary learned on Sunday. The great irony is if they played their own game at high speed and skill as they are well capable of they could have won, but that's another discussion.
The main problem the game faces is inconsistency in refereeing and by the GAA in "reviewing" incidents after a game. A Galway minor was sent off for a fair shoulder and then later contesting a high ball. Richie Murray was sent off a few years ago for a wild swing that made no contact, Richie Hogan for a wild swing that made contact with an arm, no sanction for Pa Cronin even though there was clear video evidence. Padraig Maher going around swinging wildly at everything that moved and stayed on the field for the whole game. Striking your opponent or swinging at him with the intention to strike is a red card offence and should be punished by a minimum 3 month ban. If the ref misses it then use video evidence and impose the same ban as would normally apply. After a few 3 to 6 month bans are applied the problem would be gone.
The second problem I would say (and this is common to football and hurling) is professional management setups. The games have been taken over by a mercenary greed culture where the managers are calling the shots. In my view within the GAA no manager, trainer, etc. should be paid other than normal expenses that a player receives, end of. The GAA have been derelict in not addressing this issue. In an amateur game the levels of commitment demanded of players is quite frankly ridiculous and there is zero concern for the long term health of players. The win at all costs culture mainly comes from managers who want to maintain their power and compensation, totally alien to what the GAA is supposed to be about.
Impose 3 month bans for striking and ban any team for a year that pays a manager or trainer, problem largely solved.
cerebus
(3,258 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 06:52
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
Originally posted by Anyone but FF:
I know, but talking to a casual sunshine fan today he said "did it ever dawn on you hurling lads that yer game isnt as enjoyable to watch now as it was a few years back" !
This lad gets around a bit, apparently. Was he at the Crokes/Crossmaglen game a while back, Enda?
N16
(1,724 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 07:19
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
The thing that annoys me most about the game now is all the off the ball stuff - soon as they squared up Sunday there were lads throwing belts of shoulders on their markers. What about shaking hands and getting on with it? There should be a zero tolerance policy for that crap - do it once you're booked, try it again you're off. No need for any of that in the game - there should be no contact between players unless the ball is there. You often see it as well when a sub comes in - his marker tries to get a hit in straight away to put him off. Out of order and needs to be eradicated entirely.
The game though has become more physical. You'd have to analyse the game itself on Sunday more closely to see if any infringments went unpunished or if any new rule could be brought in to make the game flow more freely. KK have brought the game to a new level but they have done it more or less within the rules and its up to others to match up. Its not long ago we were talking about whether the 2009 AIF was the greatest game of all time. Tipp and KK know each other too well now and I think that contributed to what we saw on Sunday.
frasiercrane
(1,843 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 07:51
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
Thwe whinging about the state of hurling over the last few days is bizzare.For my money the game is every bit as enjoyable to watch as it was in the 90's.The match on Sunday was excellent in the first half the second half was dreadful due to the uncompetitiveness of it.The semi final the week before was a thoroughly enjoyable game.The refs are far too liberal in their interpretation of the rules and it little bit more control from the referees would be welcome but all in all the game is in a good state.I certainly enjoy watcing it.
People are expecting far too much from hurling and football.ItThey seem to be the only two sports that a few poor matches constitutes a crisis.There are countless bad matches in other sports and people just deal with it and accept that as a norm (which it is).I suspect due to the structure of the championships there are so few matches of importance and thus some people expect each one of them to be classics wghich is riddiculous.Even last years hurling final got criticism and I thought it was an excellent game, but people seemed to be disappointed because it didnt happen to be as good as the 09 and 10 finals.
Rush
(155 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 09:38
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
Originally posted by Anyone but FF:
the sledging, the frontal hits, the off ball stuff, the pulling and dragging, the hurley around the neck and face, the chopping and the wild pulling are all more prominent now then they were a decade ago.
Enough about Tipp's tactics....did they mention Kilkenny's play at all?
old seaman
(146 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 11:03
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
[QUOTE]Originally posted by uncle betty:
2. You have no doubts about Cody and his team's role in relaxing the rules ? !Is this becasue you have a blind prejudice about it, or because you have evidence. I hope the latter, because it;s a serious thing to say and I would not like it to be true.
Every time there has been an attempt to tighten up the application of the rules (as in the NHL a few years back) Cody has been first out saying the physicality is being taken out of the game. I don't think anyone says he directly changes the rules but his influence has undoubtedly led to the present situation where anything goes and someone will soon be seriously hurt. The rules need to be applied strictly to get things back on track. If that means lots of frees, so be it. Teams will soon learn.
Hombre
(62 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 11:16
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
Originally posted by labane1917:
Hurling has always been a difficult and almost impossible game to referee. The speed of the game makes it very difficult to keep up with play let alone monitor what is going on off the ball. It is uniquely Irish and very much played "on the edge" historically. Throughout its history the game has been officiated and controlled largely by the discipline of the players. It is also a very dangerous game and serious injuries can occur (much more serious than you mentioned), either accidently or deliberately. I know of 3 men who sustained skull fractures from deliberate strikes to the head, two of whom were airlifted to hospital for emergency surgery. None of the three ever played the game again and one was left with permanent brain damage. All were young men in their 20s at the time. None of the perpetrators were ever held accountable by the authorities mainly because of the code of silence in GAA culture.
I have zero tolerance for deliberate striking and dirty play in general although I am in the "man's game" camp. Those that do not understand the difference between hard fair hurling and dirty hurling do not understand hurling and have no business commenting on it. I would be in favor of two referees, one in each half, to keep an eye on what is going on both on the ball and off the ball. There is nothing wrong with a bit of jostling and joulting between players, it has been going on since the game began and players expect it. They do not expect to be struck with a hurley when unable to defend themselves. There is also nothing wrong with surrounding a player in possession and forcing him to give up possession. The answer to swarm defense is a fast paced high skill game where the ball is kept moving at speed. Skill will always beat brawn as has been proven time and time again, a lesson Tipperary learned on Sunday. The great irony is if they played their own game at high speed and skill as they are well capable of they could have won, but that's another discussion.
The main problem the game faces is inconsistency in refereeing and by the GAA in "reviewing" incidents after a game. A Galway minor was sent off for a fair shoulder and then later contesting a high ball. Richie Murray was sent off a few years ago for a wild swing that made no contact, Richie Hogan for a wild swing that made contact with an arm, no sanction for Pa Cronin even though there was clear video evidence. Padraig Maher going around swinging wildly at everything that moved and stayed on the field for the whole game. Striking your opponent or swinging at him with the intention to strike is a red card offence and should be punished by a minimum 3 month ban. If the ref misses it then use video evidence and impose the same ban as would normally apply. After a few 3 to 6 month bans are applied the problem would be gone.
The second problem I would say (and this is common to football and hurling) is professional management setups. The games have been taken over by a mercenary greed culture where the managers are calling the shots. In my view within the GAA no manager, trainer, etc. should be paid other than normal expenses that a player receives, end of. The GAA have been derelict in not addressing this issue. In an amateur game the levels of commitment demanded of players is quite frankly ridiculous and there is zero concern for the long term health of players. The win at all costs culture mainly comes from managers who want to maintain their power and compensation, totally alien to what the GAA is supposed to be about.
Impose 3 month bans for striking and ban any team for a year that pays a manager or trainer, problem largely solved.
Excellent post.
faithfulfan
(258 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 11:23
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
Originally posted by old seaman:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by uncle betty:
2. You have no doubts about Cody and his team's role in relaxing the rules ? !Is this becasue you have a blind prejudice about it, or because you have evidence. I hope the latter, because it;s a serious thing to say and I would not like it to be true.Every time there has been an attempt to tighten up the application of the rules (as in the NHL a few years back) Cody has been first out saying the physicality is being taken out of the game. I don't think anyone says he directly changes the rules but his influence has undoubtedly led to the present situation where anything goes and someone will soon be seriously hurt. The rules need to be applied strictly to get things back on track. If that means lots of frees, so be it. Teams will soon learn.
The Leinster final was a very good game and even with Galway doing a demolition job, KK did not resort to the same dirt Tipp and to a lesser extent Cork did in the semis.
I don't remember seeing any threads about rule changes after the Leinster final when Galway ran away with it, the only time I see the subject of rule change come up is when Tipp and Cork are not doing well. It happened in the 90's when they needed games to bring them on and its happening again now because they are getting trounced.
Nothing wrong if it happens Wexford, Offaly, Waterford, etc because they're obviously not good enough but when its Tipp and Cork, well then, there has to be something wrong with the rules. Suck it up and take ye're beating and move on
faithfulfan
(258 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 11:25
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
Originally posted by labane1917:
Hurling has always been a difficult and almost impossible game to referee. The speed of the game makes it very difficult to keep up with play let alone monitor what is going on off the ball. It is uniquely Irish and very much played "on the edge" historically. Throughout its history the game has been officiated and controlled largely by the discipline of the players. It is also a very dangerous game and serious injuries can occur (much more serious than you mentioned), either accidently or deliberately. I know of 3 men who sustained skull fractures from deliberate strikes to the head, two of whom were airlifted to hospital for emergency surgery. None of the three ever played the game again and one was left with permanent brain damage. All were young men in their 20s at the time. None of the perpetrators were ever held accountable by the authorities mainly because of the code of silence in GAA culture.
I have zero tolerance for deliberate striking and dirty play in general although I am in the "man's game" camp. Those that do not understand the difference between hard fair hurling and dirty hurling do not understand hurling and have no business commenting on it. I would be in favor of two referees, one in each half, to keep an eye on what is going on both on the ball and off the ball. There is nothing wrong with a bit of jostling and joulting between players, it has been going on since the game began and players expect it. They do not expect to be struck with a hurley when unable to defend themselves. There is also nothing wrong with surrounding a player in possession and forcing him to give up possession. The answer to swarm defense is a fast paced high skill game where the ball is kept moving at speed. Skill will always beat brawn as has been proven time and time again, a lesson Tipperary learned on Sunday. The great irony is if they played their own game at high speed and skill as they are well capable of they could have won, but that's another discussion.
The main problem the game faces is inconsistency in refereeing and by the GAA in "reviewing" incidents after a game. A Galway minor was sent off for a fair shoulder and then later contesting a high ball. Richie Murray was sent off a few years ago for a wild swing that made no contact, Richie Hogan for a wild swing that made contact with an arm, no sanction for Pa Cronin even though there was clear video evidence. Padraig Maher going around swinging wildly at everything that moved and stayed on the field for the whole game. Striking your opponent or swinging at him with the intention to strike is a red card offence and should be punished by a minimum 3 month ban. If the ref misses it then use video evidence and impose the same ban as would normally apply. After a few 3 to 6 month bans are applied the problem would be gone.
The second problem I would say (and this is common to football and hurling) is professional management setups. The games have been taken over by a mercenary greed culture where the managers are calling the shots. In my view within the GAA no manager, trainer, etc. should be paid other than normal expenses that a player receives, end of. The GAA have been derelict in not addressing this issue. In an amateur game the levels of commitment demanded of players is quite frankly ridiculous and there is zero concern for the long term health of players. The win at all costs culture mainly comes from managers who want to maintain their power and compensation, totally alien to what the GAA is supposed to be about.
Impose 3 month bans for striking and ban any team for a year that pays a manager or trainer, problem largely solved.
Spot on.
manfromdelmonte
(2,268 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 11:32
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
I would have to agree
A few friends went to the game on Sunday, I didn't go due to a family function.
I asked them was it a better game watching it live?
They called it stick wrestling, not hurling and said they wouldn't pay in to see that sort of shíte again
absent
(1,452 Posts)
Posted:
22-Aug-2012 11:44
Quote
Edit
Delete
Report Post
Post Reply
Originally posted by Anyone but FF:
Lads its very intresting reading the reaction to Sundays game here over the last two days and its also been very intresting listening to lads (both hurling and non hurling men) at work discussing it over the last 48 hours. Personally ive made it clear on a few occasions here that I don't like the direction the game has taken in the last 5 or 6 years, I say that as both a fan and a club player.I saw hurling being described as lawless in yesterdays Irish Examiner and you know I found myself agreeing with that description, the sledging, the frontal hits, the off ball stuff, the pulling and dragging, the hurley around the neck and face, the chopping and the wild pulling are all more prominent now then they were a decade ago. Now its easy to say the game has evolved and it has but the rulebook hasn't and what was a foul back then should in theory still be a foul today, I know I will have the "its a mans game" brigade shouting me down here but I say to them that hurling was always a mans game before any of this "let the game flow" carry on was introduced. Men like Brendan Lynskey, John Power, Brian Corcoran, Ollie Baker all flourished and were revered in our game as hardened or tough competitors so where, when and why did some hurling people suddenly decide hurling wasnt hard enough??I have no doubt that Brian Cody (Why is a current manager on the rules commitee) and his KK team were chief instigators in this laxing of the rules but other teams have copped on and realised that they can push the limits as well. The Dubs last year were as physical a hurling team as iv seen up close, Waterford under Davy were more about physicality then skill, Galway were no angels in the Leinster final and we wont even get started on Tipps antics last Sunday. My own Cork while lagging behind in the science of the "dark arts" seem to have woken up to the fact that hurling now is governed more by guidelines rather then rules and as a result their has been a notable change in the refereeing standards down here over the course of this summer with much more being left go.Where is it all going to end up and what is becoming of hurling, In my own view we are only a few years away from seeing someone been taken from the field in a neck brace or with a bit of a finger missing as a result of foul play. Michael Rice's injury last Sunday was a terrible injury from what I thought was a foul but sure as is the norm these days its just brushed under the carpet with "its a mans game".Lads including myself are bemoaning the fall in attendences in recent seasons, The recession has an awful lot to do with it I know, but talking to a casual sunshine fan today he said "did it ever dawn on you hurling lads that yer game isnt as enjoyable to watch now as it was a few years back" Hes right you know, hurling is quickly resembling wrestling with sticks and its turning a lot of people off our sport. Tipp and KK lads will shout me down now as they claim im jealous as this change in the game has come during their reign as top dogs (and yes I am jealous of yer success, not jealous of yer current brand of hurling though).Hurling has two options I think. Implement the rules of the game, re train referees and "punish" referees who "let the game flow" or else simply re write the rule book if the majority of people want the game to be played as it currently is.The way things are going by 2020 hurling will be almost
unrecognizable to the hurling of the ninetys and early to mid noughties!
You are so right,hurling has now become a trial of strength and is nowhere near the skilful spectacle it once was.The player who wins possession is surrounded by 3 or 4 sixfooters and he has no chance to play the ball,it becomes a triumph of strength over skill.I don't believe hurling was ever intended to be like that,it has always been a game of huge skill practiced at speed.
First
1
2
3
Last
Select a page:
1
2
3
Page
1
of
3
"Speak Out!" Home
|
Topic Listing
|
Post New Topic
|
Post Reply
‘We talk just like lions, but we sacrifice like lambs…’.
Whatever Happened to….
Anyone you know in your club?
Bin Tags Don't Make a County
‘Some a’ Dem’ Lads are only Dow-en for the Showers….’
Heavenly Hurling: How the Gods pass their time...
GAA Time and Real Time
Saint Patrick and the camogie princesses
Keats and Chapman at the Munster Final
Mass, the Mater, ‘The Dergvale’ and Mullingar…
More "Content Zone" Topics >>
More "Speak Out!" Topics >>